Not long ago, a childhood friend and I were talking about the old days and she remembered her brother blasting The Doors on his stereo. When she’d complain, he’d tell her that he was “feeling
the freedom.”
No doubt about it, feeling the freedom's a great thing, no matter what you’re doing. But as a photographer, and in
particular, an underwater photographer, I’m not sure you can feel the freedom unless you’re comfortable
taking shots that don’t necessarily look like what you're seeing. One of the easiest ways to do
this is to shoot only part of an animal. And I don’t mean shooting just its head or its
face. I mean framing or cropping the shot in such a way that people looking at
it won’t see enough of the animal to necessarily know what it looks like -- or even what it is. But they’ll see enough to focus on whatever it is you
want them to focus on.
Take the squid
shot below. It's a pretty standard shot. It shows all of the squid and I like it.
The two shots below, though, are definitely different: they cut off the ends of the squids’ tentacles. By most of the rules of
composition, this is a no-no. Someone who doesn’t know what a squid looks
like will only be able to fill in some of the blanks. And that’s okay. My
purpose here isn't to show you what a squid looks like but to focus your
attention on their eyes and their chromatophores (the groups of pigment cells beneath their skin). This isn't what I saw when I looked at the squid but it's what I want you to see when you look at the shot.


The same can be
said of the two nudibranch photos below. The first shows you the entire nudibranch
and could be used to ID the species (Flabellina verrilli, in case you're
wondering). The second won’t help you much in that regard. There are two nudibranchs in it and some people might not even be able to
figure out where one ends and the other begins. Also, I’ve cut off the ends of
the cerata (the finger-like structures) of the bottom nudibranch.
Again, by
most rules of composition, the second shot shouldn’t work. But it does – at least for
me. When I look at it, I can feel the movement of the two nudibranchs across each other. I can focus in on the crimson tracts inside the cerata. And I hope you can, too. Obviously, I could
have backed up and included both nudibranchs fully in the shot -- and, to be honest, I did. But those shots lost the impact of being so close.
A more extreme example is the shot below of a common sea star. And it would have been possible to move in even closer than this.
Now, when you
take shots like this, cutting off animals in unusual ways, you have to do it in a way that everyone knows you did it on purpose – that you didn’t just
take a bad shot. You have to know what it is you want people to
focus on, and then frame the shot so that they will.
So the next time you're underwater photographing a fish or some invert, feeling the need to frame it just so to get that perfect head portrait, or to fit all of it in the shot, try something different: pick out the most interesting part, move in close and shoot just that bit. And feel the freedom.